How to Measure Group Coaching Effectiveness (With Survey Questions)

DorWay

Sandor Kovacs

February 12, 2026

Editorial photograph illustrating: How To Measure Success In Group Coaching Effectiveness: Key Metrics And Evaluation Strategies
What to measure in group coaching, when to measure it, and coaching effectiveness survey questions you can use as they are.

Most group coaching programs are judged by how participants felt at the last session. That tells you whether people enjoyed it, not whether anything changed. Measuring group coaching effectiveness means asking better questions at the right times.

This guide covers what to measure, when to measure it, and a set of coaching effectiveness survey questions you can use as they are.

What to Measure in Group Coaching

Measure four things, in order of importance to the business:

  1. Reaction. Did participants find the sessions useful and relevant?
  2. Application. Are participants using what they worked on?
  3. Behavior change. Do the people around participants experience them differently?
  4. Results. Have team outcomes moved?

Most organizations stop at the first. Only 39% of leadership development teams measure behavior change, according to the 2024 LEADx Benchmark Report.

When to Measure

When What to collect From whom
Before the first session Baseline goals, baseline behavior ratings Participants and their managers
After each session A two-question pulse on usefulness and one commitment Participants
End of program Reaction and application survey Participants
90 days after Behavior change survey Participants, managers, direct reports
6 to 12 months after Repeat behavior ratings, team outcomes Same raters, plus business data

Do not skip the later measurements. Research on multi-rater feedback found larger improvement when assessments were repeated within 12 months (Smither, London and Reilly, 2005), and change takes time to show.

Coaching Effectiveness Survey Questions

Use a 1 to 5 agreement scale for rating questions, and keep each survey under ten questions.

End-of-program survey (participants)

  1. The coaching sessions addressed situations I actually face at work.
  2. I left most sessions with a specific commitment to act on.
  3. I have used what I worked on in coaching in the past two weeks.
  4. The group format helped me see my own patterns more clearly.
  5. What is one thing you now do differently because of this coaching? (open)
  6. What got in the way of applying what you worked on? (open)

90-day survey (participants)

  1. I have kept or renegotiated the commitments I made during coaching.
  2. I handle difficult conversations differently than before the program.
  3. My manager has supported me in applying what I worked on.
  4. Describe a recent situation where you used something from coaching. What happened? (open)

90-day survey (managers and direct reports)

  1. This person follows through on what they commit to.
  2. When this person cannot keep a commitment, they address it before the deadline.
  3. This person raises problems early rather than late.
  4. I have noticed a change in how this person leads over the past three months.
  5. What, if anything, is different? (open)

The manager and direct report questions matter most. They measure behavior as others experience it, which is the only measure of leadership change that counts.

Group Coaching KPIs

  • Session commitment completion: share of commitments made in sessions that were completed or renegotiated by the next session.
  • Behavior rating change: difference between baseline and 90-day ratings from managers and direct reports.
  • Application rate: share of participants reporting use of coaching content in the past two weeks.
  • Team outcomes: engagement, retention, and goal attainment on participants’ teams.

Commitment completion is the most useful leading indicator. If commitments made in sessions are not being kept, behavior ratings will not move. That is the logic behind DorWay’s focus on team agreements and accountability in leadership.

Analyzing the Results

  1. Compare 90-day ratings with the baseline, by participant and for the group.
  2. Look at the gap between participants’ self-ratings and others’ ratings. A large gap is a coaching topic in itself.
  3. Read the open answers for what got in the way. These are usually the fastest fixes.
  4. Share results with participants and turn the biggest gaps into the next round of commitments.

For a fuller framework, see how to evaluate a leadership development program and how to measure leadership effectiveness.

FAQ

What are good coaching effectiveness survey questions?

Questions that ask about specific behavior, not satisfaction. For example: “I have kept or renegotiated the commitments I made during coaching,” and, for managers, “This person follows through on what they commit to.”

How often should you evaluate group coaching?

Briefly after each session, at the end of the program, at 90 days, and again at 6 to 12 months.

What are the challenges in measuring group coaching?

Separating the coaching’s effect from other changes, getting honest input from others, and keeping measurement going after the program ends. A baseline and repeat ratings from the same raters address most of these.

Related: group coaching vs. individual outcomes, online vs. in-person group coaching, and assessing the impact of coaching on performance.

Tracy Vasaturo

Head of Sales

Tracy Vasaturo has spent the better part of two decades in rooms where the stakes are high and the sell is real. Medical devices. SaaS. ERP. High-ticket coaching programs. Live events. She has sold millions across her career — but the throughline has always been the same: finding the bridge between a technology or a transformation and the person who needs it. She’s sold to Fortune 500 executives and to entrepreneurs rebuilding their lives from scratch. She’s worked corporate sales floors and grassroots stages.

She understands that people don’t just buy a product — they buy into a belief that something can change.

At DorWay, Tracy works with individuals, entrepreneurs, executives, and organizational teams who are ready to lead and operate differently. If you’re exploring whether DorWay is right for you, there’s a good chance Tracy is who you’ll talk to first. That’s very much by design.

Thyme Francis

Chief Client Experience and Creative Officer | Co-Founder
Thyme Francis is the architect of how every client experiences DorWay, from the first moment of contact through the full arc of their transformation journey.
 

Her background spans creative direction and financial services, an unusual combination that turns out to be exactly the right one for her role. The creative lens means she understands how people experience brands, communications, and environments emotionally, not just functionally. The financial services background means she understands precision, accountability, and the weight of decisions that actually matter.

What Thyme does at DorWay is ensure that the quality of the client experience matches the quality of the transformation the programs are designed to create. That every touchpoint (every communication, every program delivery, every interaction with the DorWay team) reflects the same integrity and intentionality that DorWay teaches.

She brings to every client relationship the same thing she brings to every aspect of her work: genuine attention to the specific person in front of her. Their story. Their goals. What they actually need versus what they think they need. The ability to hold both the detail and the larger vision simultaneously.

In an organization built on the conviction that leadership is fundamentally relational, Thyme ensures that DorWay practices that conviction in every interaction it has.